Search for: "Apple Inc. v. Vidal"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 311 the Court of Appeal concluded that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights required the remedy of compensation where distress had been suffered as a result of a breach of duty. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
The Safari Workaround was essentially the subject-matter of Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 [2016] QB 1003. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Apple Inc., 2014 BCSC 1821 Albayate v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
In Google Inc v Vidal-Hall & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) the English Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from its attempt to get the case dismissed noting that “the damages may be small, but the issues of principle are large. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 5:42 pm
References The UK case: Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (Vidal-Hall, Hann and Bradshaw v Google Inc);http://www.5rb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Vidal-Hall-v-Google.pdf The ECJ Judgment: C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González” can be found onhttp://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:08 pm
Wash.2014) Apple Inc. v Motorola, Inc. 2014 WL 1646435 (CAFC, 2014) AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Cinar: Blatant Copying is Substantial Copying http://t.co/TO9Kv0tJuI -> http://t.co/s1nb3ccfiz recommended reads http://t.co/jgvPKGZsxp -> Nimmer Urges Congress To Reaffirm Copyright Act’s “Making Available” Right http://t.co/G3T0a7pQ4n -> Net neutrality gets a kick in the teeth | ZDNet http://t.co/NIVsYzOVum -> Oracle suit against third party maintenance contractor ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Cinar: Blatant Copying is Substantial Copying http://t.co/TO9Kv0tJuI -> http://t.co/s1nb3ccfiz recommended reads http://t.co/jgvPKGZsxp -> Nimmer Urges Congress To Reaffirm Copyright Act’s “Making Available” Right http://t.co/G3T0a7pQ4n -> Net neutrality gets a kick in the teeth | ZDNet http://t.co/NIVsYzOVum -> Oracle suit against third party maintenance contractor ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
Mr Justice Tugendhat yesterday gave judgment in the case of Vidal-Hall and Others v Google Inc [2014] EWHC 13 (QB). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:33 am
On January 16, 2014, the English High Court of Justice issued reasons in Vidal-Hall v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:33 am
On January 16, 2014, the English High Court of Justice issued reasons in Vidal-Hall v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
