Search for: "Application of Barrett"
Results 61 - 80
of 957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
However, neither Justice Barrett nor any other Justice challenged Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
§ 1123(b)(6), a “catchall” provision indicating that a bankruptcy plan may “include any other appropriate provision not inconsistent with the applicable provisions of” the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court rejected their application for an emergency stay. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
The court will be considering 214 petitions and applications at this week’s conference. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
The Exactech court found this history equally applicable to Article II. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
" That referred to then-Judge Barrett's dissent in Kanter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 1:17 pm
" Second, the Court will likely conclude that one such historical principle—as then-Judge Barrett has already argued in detail—is that the government may forbid those who have been shown to be dangerous to keep and bear arms. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
(The New York Times picked up Justice Barrett's question). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
The Supreme Court denied Florida's application. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 2:32 pm
Statement of Justice Kavanaugh, with whom Justice Barrett joins except as to footnote 1 [noted in braces below -EV], respecting the denial of the application for stay. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:36 pm
Kavanaugh and Barrett appeared to disagree with the grounds upon which the state of Florida appealed the lower court’s ruling. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
This is the argument that Seth Barrett Tillman and I have advanced. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:26 pm
Three justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – indicated that they would have granted the state’s application, but they did not provide any explanation for their votes. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
Section 922(g)(8), she continued, is a “clear application” of the principle “that you can disarm dangerous people. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
.'" See also Justice Barrett's concurrence in Bruen, quoting Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
These questions, and this framework, will have application beyond Rahimi. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:45 am
Rachel Weiner, Perry Stein, Tom Jackman, Devlin Barrett, and Spencer S. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Newsom stated that a government regulation is not generally applicable if it treats "any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise. [read post]
