Search for: "Application of Campbell County" Results 41 - 60 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 1:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Wilson v Campbell (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2019) UKUT 363 (LC) In which the Upper Tribunal gives the First Tier Tribunal a thorough ticking off over its decision on a rent repayment order application. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am by MOTP
Mendoza, Appellee.Appeal from the 21st District Court of Bastrop County, No. 174-21, the Honorable Carson Talmadge Campbell, Judge Presiding.Affirmed.Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith.MEMORANDUM OPINIONCHARI L. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:09 pm by Mark Hartsoe
The Circuit Court for Campbell County granting the motion, holding that the Act did not apply to manufacturers who lawfully produced drugs – only to those illegally involved in the drug trade – and that, thus, the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Carteret County Sheriff’s deputies observed what they believed to be a drug transaction in the parking lot of an apartment complex. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm by Shea Denning
Last year, a criminal case involving an accidental shooting that injured an eleven-year-old girl was resolved in Durham County Superior Court with application of restorative justice principles. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
LEXIS 5809, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County (Ohio Ct. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:30 am by admin
Campbell, 146 Mich App 295; 380 N.W.2d 88 (1985); City of Detroit v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Act 1974, and (3) Deputy District Judge Washckuhn, who had heard a County Court claim against Ezeugo’s wife (in which Ezeugo had appeared). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:15 am by Ilene Cooper
This was the result achieved by the Second Department’s opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The takeaway from the Campbell and Voykin cases is that expert testimony is required in explaining a prior medical condition and also would be applicable for post occurrence injuries as well. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant also seeks an order pursuant to CPLR §321 l(a)(J); CPLR §321 J(d); and CPLR §321 l(a)(S), dismissing the action on the grounds that it is time barred by the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm by James Yang
Campbell, the alleged infringer (Campbell Company) attempted to invalidate a patent via the first way under 35 USC 102(a)(1). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:12 am by James Yang
  Eventually, I suspect that Broadcom’s patent applications will eventually be assigned to Avago Technologies, not Broadcom. [read post]