Search for: "Application of Consumers Union of US, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Union des consommateurs, 2007 SCC 34, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801at paras. 84-86. [2] See Difederico v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
It was less than a year ago that the US-based company France.com Inc. lost its registered rights in France to the  domain name and trade mark ‘France.com’ in favour of  the rights  held by the Republic of  France (hereand here). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Applicant argues that the mark does not immediately convey information, and in fact the consumer must use their imagination and thought to arrive at the qualities of the goods. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
As further explained below, the decision of the Federal Court in United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
As further explained below, the decision of the Federal Court in United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
” The Federal Circuit cited its 2009 Aycock Eng’g Inc. v Airflite, Inc. ruling, which explained the use requirement for a service mark. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
The new members are as follows: Consumer Advisory Board Members Lynn Drysdale, Managing Attorney, Consumer Law Unit, Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc., Jacksonville, FL Paulina Gonzalez, Executive Director, California Reinvestment Coalition, San Francisco, CA William Howle, Head of U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
With the use of these applications by consumers and business proliferates, Congress, OCR, the FTC, state regulators and others are upping the responsibilities and the liability of businesses that fail to appropriately consider and implement security in their mobile devices and applications. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
If they choose to withdraw their application then they will receive a US$138,000 refund (80% of the fee) [that's still a disbursement cost of US$34,500 to get this far, the same as just over 200 UK trade mark applications - Merpel]. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:30 am by Nedim Malovic
In 2020, the Cancellation Division granted the application for revocation in respect of all the goods covered by the contested mark. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:10 am
" The relevant public includes ordinary consumers who use ATM machines, as well as banks, credit unions, other providers of ATM goods and services.Based on dictionary definitions, the Board found that CARDLESS CASH means access to money without a credit or debit card. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
Those legal rights are not as extensive as equivalent rights enjoyed in other places, like the European Union. [read post]