Search for: "Application of Fisk" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Chief Justice Harlan Fisk Stone said in 1941, in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:47 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 The LSAC responded, and Tamanaha has fisked the response. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:33 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone wrote: The power to regulate commerce is the power "to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed," Gibbons v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
In Kagan, writes Justice Catterson, "[n]o such reference to the fiduciary duties of managers appears in the applicable section 7.10 in this case. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm by Gabriel Houghton
United States (1910), “[A] principle, to be vital, must be capable of wider application than the mischief which gave it birth. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Special Issue, 2011, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 11-54Catherine Fisk and Erwin Chemerinsky Duke University School of Law and University of California, Irvine School of Law , Duke University - School of Law , University of California, Irvine School of Law Abstract: In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
Your Curmudgeon takes pride in his attention to details -- and he does not like being misled. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:05 pm
The whole document calls out for fisking, so here we go -- the questions are in bold, the party-line answers are in green, my fisks are in blue, and I have added the italics for purposes of emphasizing the phrases I deem noteworthy [N.B.: for some unknown reason, Blogger's colored text is not reproducing, so I have temporarily put the official, party-line answers in italics, while my fisks are in regular type, and the previous simple italics are now all bold… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:06 pm by Dave Hoffman
 (Tamanaha memorably fisked the AALS here.) [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 7:58 pm by Adam Levitin
The typical PSA requirement for a complete or unbroken chain of indorsements to the person signing the indorsement in blank means only that there be no gaps in the chain of indorsements, and that the chain of indorsements be sufficient to effect a transfer to the trust under applicable law. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
David Hogberg offers his fisking of the New Republic's Jonathon Cohn's take on efforts at repealing ObamaCare©. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Steven M. Taber
September 20, 2010, Volume 2, Number 27 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Design Alliance, 223 P.3d 664, 670 (Ariz. 2010) (§21).With this background, the Third Restatement seems well matched for Arizona.ArkansasArkansas product liability is primarily statutory, thus limiting the applicability of common-law doctrines. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:59 pm by Cian Murphy
In this first part of the mini-carnival Human Rights in Ireland is in conversation with Penny Green, Professor of Law and Criminology at King’s College London and Director of the International State Crime Initiative. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:45 am
For example: "Consumers considered to be in the "purchase" stage include policyholders who fully submit an application and are accepted into coverage. [read post]