Search for: "Application of Hollingsworth"
Results 41 - 60
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
* * * * * Thanks to our friends at Hollingsworth LLP for bringing this case to our attention. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Since the SCOTUS decisions in United States -v- Windsor and Hollingsworth -v- Perry last summer, the civil rights push for same-sex marriage equality has picked-up momentum throughout the country. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
In the second case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
The California Supreme Court reasoned that “the lack of commonality that typifies personal-jury mass-tort class action cases presumptively precludes application of the American Pipe tolling rule because the class action suit rarely will serve to sufficiently notify the defendants of each class member’s claim. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Mulkey (and indeed to the odd disposition of the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(Roberts invoked standing in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
In another case decided the same day, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
In an op-ed for the U-T San Diego, Harold Johnson criticizes the Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the biggest surprise was the cross-ideological lineup in the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Below is a listing of some takeaways of the more readily apparent tax consequences and implications from this week’s two DOMA decisions (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Napolitano, US DC Cir. (06/25/13)Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Immigration LawPlaintiff challenged the district court’s holding affirming the USCIS’s denial of several of plaintiff’s petitions for Q-1 visas for foreign applicants to its cultural exchange program. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
Neither of these scenarios will now happen…at least not from a direct application of DOMA to the provisions of the Copyright Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
We may celebrate the outcome in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
So now the irate patent attorney has something else to blame for not getting his client’s application approved. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Additionally, the High Court dismissed the companion same-sex marriage case, Hollingsworth v Perry, holding that the proponents of California’s “Proposition 8,” which amended the state constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, lacked standing to appeal a federal district court’s ruling that the ballot initiative was unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:48 pm
Because the plaintiffs brought a facial challenge to Prop 8, its invalidation means there is no possible constitutional application of the law for the named defendants as to any applicants (although this reasoning does not seem quite right to me). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Because of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
By doing so it violates basic due process and equal protection principles applicable to the Federal Government. [read post]
