Search for: "Application of Hollingsworth" Results 61 - 80 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Neither of these scenarios will now happen…at least not from a direct application of DOMA to the provisions of the Copyright Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Neither of these scenarios will now happen…at least not from a direct application of DOMA to the provisions of the Copyright Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm by Edwin Komen
Neither of these scenarios will now happen…at least not from a direct application of DOMA to the provisions of the Copyright Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Neither of these scenarios will now happen…at least not from a direct application of DOMA to the provisions of the Copyright Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
Supreme Court on March 27, 2013—the day after arguments were heard in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In Perry it could hold that amending the state constitution to eliminate the right of same sex couples to marry violated equal protection, and in Windsor, it could hold that the application of DOMA to deny federal recognition to a same sex marriage that is valid under the law of the state where the parties reside violates 10th Amendment state sovereignty and/or equal protection. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Holder, the Voting Rights Act case; or Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am by Conor McEvily
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
A lot of things happened last week – so much that our usual wrap-up search last Friday took over three hours, which is more than twice as long as normal. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm by Pamela Wolf
Hearing oral argument on March 26, in Hollingsworth v Perry (Dkt No 12-144), the Court faced the question of whether California’s Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, is constitutional. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm by Jason Mazzone
Predicting the result in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm by John Bellinger
  But while this might dispose of the Kiobel case (for the time being), it would provide little guidance to lower courts about the application of the ATS in other cases. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 12:35 pm by Howard Wasserman
The key is, what would massive resistance to Hollingsworth look like? [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage and commentary focused on the upcoming oral arguments in the same-sex marriage cases, Hollingsworth v. [read post]