Search for: "Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)"
Results 1 - 20
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm
This is all the more surprising as Article L. 614-9 of the same Code, which lists the rights arising from the application, does not mention Article L. 615-3. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:34 am
In a highly principled matter, the Danish Maritime and Commercial High Court has ruled to dismiss Novartis’ application for a preliminary injunction against Glenmark, Zentiva, and Viatris based on the patent application EP 2 959 894 (the “894-application”). [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:10 am
Data based on a snapshot from the Unified Patent Court Case Management System taken at 23:09 CET on 3 March 2023. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 11:55 pm
In this case, it was a confirmation of a decision of the INPI to reject a SPC application for nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 12:44 pm
Regardless of the degree to which one agrees or disagrees with this proposal (for discussion see Peter Mankowski, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft [RIW] 2018, 488; Andrew Dickinson, IPRax 2018, 337; Michael F. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
The scrutiny of S. 3(e) in the present case also sheds light on the standards required to be met for its applicability to composition claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:50 pm
Today, Andrew Boortz of Reed Smith provides some insight on the site, which highlights whenever anyone uses a location-based web application to 'check in' someplace, therefore letting everyone know that they are no longer at home. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm
The local division in Paris has had 19 cases (7 infringement, 11 counterclaim for revocation, 1 application for preserving evidence), followed by Düsseldorf (18 cases), Mannheim (11 cases) and Hamburg (8 cases). [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
This post explores that potential broader application. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data… [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 1:13 pm
City of Fargo, Case No. 3:22-cv-183. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:40 am
615-3 and R. 615-3 of FIPC), and which may also be appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
This case reflects an important application of the right to be forgotten under article 8 of the Convention. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
There five published “resolved complaints”: Andrew Newman v Daily Mail (clause 1), Morag Powell v Scotsman (clauses 1 and 3), Bryony Hill v Mail on Sunday (clauses 1, 3 and 4), Sean McGrath v Herald (Glasgow) (clause 1) and Peter Jones v Daily Telegraph (clause 1). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:19 am
The Court concluded that in this case the applicant had acted with sufficient urgency in seeking the PI, but this will depend on the facts in each case. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 4:12 am
As this defense is so new, the decision (4c O 18/21) by the Regional Court of Düsseldorf, which has just been released for publication and is the first one in a pharma case where Sec. 139(1) clause 3 has been invoked, might be of particular interest to patent practitioners. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
French case law contains numerous examples of the application of the notion of plausibility. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:16 am
§ 106(3); Peter S. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:33 pm
The extensive number of prior CJEU referrals on Article 3(c) was seen not as a sign of settled case law but rather as reflecting persisting difficulties of interpretation, and the specific case at hand was regarded as showing significant similarities to the cases underlying the pending Finnish and Irish CJEU referrals. [read post]
