Search for: "Application of Shakespeare Company" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
In August 2000 Jackson filed a CTM application for the trade mark ROYAL SHAKESPEARE in Classes 32, 33 and 42 (No 001787670). [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:35 pm
The event was the seventh in a series, entitled Shakespeare and the Law, produced by the Boston Lawyers Chapter in conjunction with the Commonwealth Shakespeare Company. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
The event, held on May 4, 2009, is the ninth in the series "Shakespeare and the Law," produced by the Boston Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society, in conjunction with Commonwealth Shakespeare Company. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:36 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
After all of the years of litigation, the high profile appeals, the articles and panels discussing the case, the decision, from a practical perspective, can be best summed up by Shakespeare: its simply sound and fury, signifying nothing, at least not from either a practical or an academic perspective when it comes to either the law of ERISA or its practical application. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 10:45 am by Mikella P. Wickham
William Shakespeare’s character Juliet famously asked Romeo “What’s in a name? [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:12 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
Borrowing from William Shakespeare … WHAT’S IN A NAME? [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
However, you can reserve the mark by filing an intent-to-use application, provided you have a bona fide intent to use the marks on the goods. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
So, Tibble, Tibble, toil and trouble, to paraphrase (badly) Shakespeare (MacBeth, to be precise). [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:41 am by Neil Wilkof
They instituted opposition proceedings against the Application Mark (below) filed by the Singaporean company Keep Waddling International Pte. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:58 am by Will
Another non-drug/device case recently caught our eye, not only because it allows us to parody Shakespeare, but because of its potential implication for all those companies that are based in New Jersey and get sued under the liberal New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act as a result (and as we all know, there is a considerable drug/device presence in the Garden State). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:23 am by gmlevine
Shakespeare Company as noted above concerns application of paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
[Fresh Market], and dismissed the matter as an “exemplary case” for application of Corwin. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:19 pm
Applications to medical schools continue to rise. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
Plaintiff sought application of the law of New Jersey, where Defendant was located. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "Plaintiff Peter Faulisi ("Faulisi") along with non-party Courtland Shakespeare ("Shakespeare") wanted to market and patent an invention they believed would be very valuable through their company Protostorm.com, LLC ("Protostorm").2 They enlisted the help of several lawyers—the Defendants and Third-Party Defendants. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Sadly, our poor plantings, unlike the daisies and violets in Shakespeare's "Spring," shall never "paint the meadows with delight. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:24 am by banderson
What no one could predict, including Shakespeare himself, is the horrific precision with which such a deed could be carried out. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:24 am by banderson
What no one could predict, including Shakespeare himself, is the horrific precision with which such a deed could be carried out. [read post]