Search for: "Applied Companies, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States, Defendant-appellee"
Results 61 - 80
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Case Background Steve Granger and Paul Steigerwald, the appellees, owned the four unit rental property at issue in this case. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 5:42 am
Oct. 10, 2006):Plaintiff-appellant Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada ("RSA") seeks damages from defendants-appellees Century International Arms, Inc. and Century Arms, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Plaintiffs brought the present action against defendant-appellee Michael Leavitt, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("defendant" or "the Secretary"), pursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Genuine Issue of Material FactThe four elements of a breach of contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid contract; (2) performance, or tendered performance, by the plaintiff; (3) breach of the contract by the defendant; and (4) damages to the plaintiff resulting from that breach. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Plaintiff-Appellant Jose Antonio Rodriguez ("Rodriguez") sued his former employer, Defendant-Appellee FedEx Freight East, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We affirmed their convictions in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Contrary to the defendants' argument, it makes no difference whether the plaintiff Grand Cayman Islands corporation has its principal place of business in the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
GCC International Limited, et al. (11/16/2007, non-precedential): appeal from grant of preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from "making, using, offering for sale, or selling in the United States, or importing into the United States, any product that falls within the scope of claim 58 of U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Adam Stone, for Plaintiff-Appellee. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
” The individual Defendants, both residents of California, moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and all Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Plaintiff-Appellant University of Pittsburgh ("University") brought suit against Defendants-Appellees David W. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
(NFP) - "Appellants-plaintiffs Phyllis Wilson, as the personal representative of the Estate of Verlie L. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
[v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Answer: Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
I have not been able to find the appellate decision, though it has been referenced by IAM (as a key post-Sisvel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
