Search for: "Applied Companies, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States, Defendant-appellee"
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:18 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MITCHEL A. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm
Intervenor Defendant-Appellant Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), a phosphate mining company engaged in significant operations in Hardee County, Florida, appealed the order by the district court remanding a mining-permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) back to the agency and further enjoining Mosaic from conducting operations approved in that permit. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Answer: Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Meltzer summed up the business reality best when he testified regarding the companies’ health plan, stating, “Contractors Flooring was an existing company for tax purposes. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
" The Second Circuit Appeals Court ruled that, "We hold that: (1) Plaintiffs-Appellants' claims do not present non-justiciable political questions; (2) Plaintiffs-Appellants have standing to bring their claims; (3) Plaintiffs-Appellants state claims under the federal common law of nuisance; (4) Plaintiffs-Appellants' claims are not displaced; and (5) the discretionary function exception does… [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
[v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
VAN DEN BERG, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Plaintiff-appellant West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (West Bend) appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, who consist of a group of insurance companies that includes the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (Fidelity) and Federated Mutual Insurance Company (Federated). [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
Trivedi, altered the substance of that e-mail to provide supporting evidence that would avoid a statute of frauds defense, and then provided the altered e-mail in response to documentary production and urged its authenticity in sworn affidavits in the Federal Court and in this Court.' Appellate Brief of the Defendants-Appellees, Munshani v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Plaintiff-Appellant Kevin Dunn, Sr. appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Officer B. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Plaintiff-Appellant University of Pittsburgh ("University") brought suit against Defendants-Appellees David W. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Plaintiff-Appellant Anthony Harris ("Harris") filed suit against Defendants-Appellees Amanda Spies Bornhorst ("Spies")1 and Tuscarawas County, Ohio ("Tuscarawas") (collectively, the "defendants"),2 asserting claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Plaintiffs-Appellees brought this suit in federal district court, alleging that Defendant-Appellant CenturyTel, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Contrary to the defendants' argument, it makes no difference whether the plaintiff Grand Cayman Islands corporation has its principal place of business in the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
We therefore vacate defendant's sentence and remand for resentencing. 07a0460p.06 City of Cleveland v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
GCC International Limited, et al. (11/16/2007, non-precedential): appeal from grant of preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from "making, using, offering for sale, or selling in the United States, or importing into the United States, any product that falls within the scope of claim 58 of U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]
