Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 201 - 220
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
Apprendi v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:08 am
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
Under Apprendi v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
New Jersey (2000) and its capital follow-on, Ring v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
New Jersey, requiring juries — not judges — to find facts to support enhancing a criminal sentence 11-9953 — Boyer v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the forerunner of the Court's landmark decisions in Blakely v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
(4) Whether the District Court violated Apprendi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am
Apprendi v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to the imposition of criminal fines.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) can't be retroactively applied under Teague. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm
New Jersey, any fact (except a prior conviction) that enhances a sentence beyond the statutory maximum, must be either admitted by the defendant or proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, to the satisfaction of a jury. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:26 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
This was the insight of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. [read post]