Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 201 - 220 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Lyle Denniston
New Jersey, requiring juries — not judges — to find facts to support enhancing a criminal sentence 11-9953 — Boyer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Anthony Lake
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the forerunner of the Court's landmark decisions in Blakely v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am by Russ Bensing
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to the imposition of criminal fines.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) can't be retroactively applied under Teague. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm by Jeff Gamso
New Jersey, any fact (except a prior conviction) that enhances a sentence beyond the statutory maximum, must be either admitted by the defendant or proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, to the satisfaction of a jury. [read post]