Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 221 - 240 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
”) Apprendi New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory prescribed maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
New Jersey, holding that facts increasing the defendant’s statutory maximum sentence must be found by a jury. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:09 pm
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm by Gabriel Chin
New Jersey, which seem to suggest that “any fact necessary” to a judgment must be presented to the jury. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:04 am by Amy Howe
New Jersey, which held that juries – rather than judges – must find, beyond a reasonable doubt, any facts that increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
New Jersey applies to the imposition of criminal fines. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm by Anna Christensen
New Jersey (requiring a jury verdict before a criminal sentence may be increased), and Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
New Jersey, that a judge may increase a sentence only if the enhancement is based upon facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
New Jersey and sequels apply when a jury is asked to impose death, rather than life, as a sentence. [read post]