Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 101 - 120 of 271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
New Jersey (2000), which held that a jury, and not a judge, must find the facts that increase a statutory maximum prison term. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm by Michael O'Hear
New Jersey (2000), which held that a jury, and not a judge, must find the facts that increase a statutory maximum prison term. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question in this case was whether the imposition of criminal fines is subject to the Sixth Amendment principle articulated in Apprendi v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:20 am by Ed Roggenkamp
New Jersey, which held that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases prohibits a judge from deciding facts that increase a criminal defendant’s maximum potential sentence. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
New Jersey, that a judge may increase a sentence only if the enhancement is based upon facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
One lonely new hold: Coleman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:38 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether the imposition of criminal fines is subject to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment principles articulated in Apprendi v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:49 am by David Oscar Markus
New Jersey, which said that “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 11:11 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to... [read post]