Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 141 - 160
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 12:22 pm
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Ring v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
New Jersey, Ring, Blakely, Whitfield and their progeny;” “(4) Taylor is not entitled to retroactive application of Ring or its progeny;”“(5) For the reasons discussed above, Taylor remains bound by his strategic decision in 1991 to have his sentence imposed by a judge rather than a jury. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:06 am
New Jersey(2000), Blakely v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489 (2000). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm
New Jersey (U.S. 2000): Petitioner also contends that the jury instructions led to an Apprendi error[]. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Intentional Acts: HERPES INFECTION NOT AN 'ACCIDENT,' NEW JERSEY APPEALS COURT RULES, D.V. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
Further, the petitioner cited the case of Apprendi v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:05 am
New Jersey which entitles defendants to a jury trial on sentencing factors that increase the maximum sentence. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
In the landmark decision Apprendi v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), where a judge, and not a jury, determined the facts as to the number of days of violation under a schedule of fines. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 10:12 am
New Jersey. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:17 am
New Jersey and Harris v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:24 pm
In Apprendi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:24 pm
In Apprendi v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 1:52 pm
It is interesting to note that New Jersey's hate crime statute, as it then existed, was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the 2001 case of New Jersey v. [read post]
