Search for: "Apt v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am
Justice Scalia begins by quoting Aramco on that presumption: "legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
United States was unanimous, though it didn’t get there through the ordinary route of agreement. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
The less-known case (United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 12:52 pm
General Observations About the Work Streams V. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
United States [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
During the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:46 am
My prior post discussing Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:12 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am
Analyzing State Employment Authorization for Noncitizens in the US by Ahilan Arulanantham (@ahilan_toolong) FISA Surveillance Reform The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part V: The HPSCI Majority FISA Working Group Report by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) and Noah Chauvin (@NoahChauvin) Biden Administration: Spy Tools The Biden Administration Should Continue Rebuffing NSO Group’s Latest Lobbying Efforts by Talya Nevins, Nicole Mo and Carrie DeCell (@cmd_dc) Supreme Court Ethics… [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am
More specifically, the traditional limiting principles are especially apt in a context, such as United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:19 am
Weideman Today the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Dukes v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
United States, 235 P.3d 42 (Cal. 2010) (The statutory phrase “keep the premises safe” is an apt description of the property-based duties underlying premises liability, a liability category that does not include vehicular negligence.) [read post]
