Search for: "Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A."
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2021, 3:05 am
Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
A claim to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166 [2001]; Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957 [2016]). [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
The Sacco defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal [*2]malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, LLC, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 652; Atiencia v… [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
“However, pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, the time within which to sue on the claim is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:12 am
[*2]v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
[*2]v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957 [2016]). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
“The causation element requires a showing that the injured party would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
Pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, “ ’the time within which to sue on the [cause of action] is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates’ ” (Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789, quoting Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer,… [read post]
