Search for: "Arbed Americas, LLC v. United States" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by Simon Lester
Similarly, in Marvin Feldman v Mexico, the United States submitted a view that benefitted the claimant’s claim that under NAFTA 1117(1), the NAFTA did not bar a claim against Mexico under Chapter 11 by a natural person who was both a citizen of the United States and a permanent resident of Mexico (Marvin Roy Feldman v United Mexican States, Submission of the United States of America on… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 The Wells Fargo choice-of-law paragraph states as follows: This Agreement and your account, as well as our rights and duties and your rights and duties regarding this Agreement and your account, will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the United States and, to the extent applicable, the law of the State of South Dakota, regardless of where you reside or use your account at any time. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]