Search for: "Arden Courts"
Results 21 - 40
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
In Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525, [69], Arden LJ ‘……emphatically reject[ed] any suggestion that this court [was] in any way concerned with what is usually referred to as piercing the corporate veil. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
Bott appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am
The Supreme Court, in a magisterial leading judgment given by Lady Black and in consenting judgments given by Lord Stephens and Lady Arden, accepted that the inherent jurisdiction continued to allow the High Court to sanction placements in unapproved Discussion On one analysis, it looks like the statutory regime developed in and under section 25 of the 1989 Act, and its equivalent in Wales, was intended to be comprehensive. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 3:37 am
Lady Arden holds that any extension of equitable liens must be principled. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
Lady Arden observes that the constitutional reason Lord Hodge gives for the courts not using explanatory notes no longer applies insofar as explanatory notes are now often published by commercial publishers and appear online free of charge. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 8:38 am
Lady Arden considers that the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction under section 13 to hear the appellant’s appeal. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
In a paper, Arden Rowell, professor at the University of Illinois College of Law, argued that cost-benefit analysis—a method by which agencies weigh the positive and negative impacts of a rule—is not merely a technical analysis, but one that imports ethical value judgments as well. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:47 am
Google’s appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599) was heard on 28 and 29 April 2021 by a panel consisting of Lord Reed, Lady Arden and Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am
Lady Arden affirmed the principle that a court order is valid until set aside and distinguished the judicial bias cases which can lead to automatic nullity. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
In reaching its decision, the High Court applied the principles stipulated by Arden LJ in Chandler v Cape Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525 regarding the circumstances in which a parent company could incur liability in negligence to third parties arising out of the operations of its subsidiary. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:43 am
Lady Arden considered that the contract was not just for services but for the absolute obligations to provide software which conformed to specification. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:45 am
Attorney Jonathan Karp with WPBF TV meteorologist Chris Martinez, co-chairs of the Executive Leadership Team L-R Karp Law Firm Office Assistants Rosalinda Pecoraro, Emily Bergel and Samantha Spann Attorney Jonathan Karp with Marcia Teele of Arden Courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am
The leading judgment is given by Lady Arden. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
Arden Courts of Yardley PA, LLC, No. 2018-01927 (Pa. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Lady Arden noted that representative actions are a well-established chancery practice. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the long awaited Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Lady Justice Arden commented that it may not be possible to pull at one strand of the principle of proportionality and she remarked that all the circumstances should be considered, including whether the actions of the data controller were deliberate. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm
A panel made up of Lord Reed, Lady Arden and Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows will decide whether, following the decision in Merricks v MasterCard [2020] UKSC 51, the winds of group litigation continue to blow in a pro-consumer direction. [read post]
