Search for: "Arizona Dept. of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm
The Arizona firm waited for their bank’s notification that the check they received from the “debtor” was valid before issuing payment to “Groat Machinery, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
LEXIS 450 (3d Dept. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:26 am
Update 10/5/23: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
Guard: The corrections dept.'s social-media policy, which forbids employees from discrediting the dept. or harming its reputation, is unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:04 am
Update 12/9/22: We received a report of more scams. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:53 am
He contacted the State Bar of Texas Chief Disciplinary Counsel’s Office and has spoken to the State Bar Membership Dept., who made a note on his record in case something comes up in the future. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 11:26 am
He contacted the State Bar of Texas Chief Disciplinary Counsel’s Office and has spoken to the State Bar Membership Dept., who made a note on his record in case something comes up in the future. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
[A reply to Professor Andrew Koppelman] In the Arizona Law Review, Professor Andrew Koppelman asks the provocative question Why Do (Some) Originalists Hate America? [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
He contacted the State Bar of Texas Chief Disciplinary Counsel’s Office and has spoken to the State Bar Membership Dept., who made a note on his record in case something comes up in the future. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Trump Justice Dept. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
Arizona Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Michael Flynn Judge Emphasizes He Is Not a ‘Rubber Stamp’ in Justice Dept. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 2:00 pm
Clair Correctional Facility will continue unseen. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
Examples of such cases include Chiu v Chiu, 125 AD3d 824 [2d Dept 2015], and Kassab v Kasab, 56 Misc 1213(A) [Sup Ct, Queens County 2017]. [read post]
