Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 341 - 360
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
This article discusses this new law’s technical provisions and examines its important implications for Colorado liability insurers, construction professionals, and construction defect claimants.In response to concerns regarding how courts were applyingthe insurance coverage case General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 11:03 am
We represent investors in all 50 states including Arizona. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit egregiously failed to apply clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:49 pm
” In addition to the additional costs that employers can incur to fund health plan liabilities, taking prudent steps to detect, prevent and redress fraudulent health plan claims is considered part of the fiduciary duies of heatlh plan fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Minnesota Breast Implant applied Arizona law.Wiggins v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Arizona claim is procedurally barred as it was raised and rejected on direct appeal, and even if claim were not barred, it is rejectedReported at 35 Fla. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
The court has relisted two cases asking whether it should revisit its holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:22 pm
Ecuador's law requires employer-employee profit sharing, after all. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:53 pm
The Resolution Agreement highlights the difficulty that health care providers and other covered entities often face in properly recognizing and handling PHI in the case of fraud or other disputes. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 6:08 am
The Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 protects employers from liability if they took certain actions based on a government agency’s interpretation of the la [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Glocks”: Patient-Physician Relationships, Guns and Free SpeechWendy Parmet, Northeastern University School of Law and School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs , Applying the First Amendment to Physician Speech: A Public Health ApproachChristopher Robertson, University of Arizona James E. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 9:06 pm
Ag employers are advi [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Finally, under provisions of H.B. 2838,[6] Arizona will allow partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs), and S corporations to pay a 4.5 percent tax at the entity level instead of having all business-related income pass through to the individual income tax. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Yen, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law, Boston College Law School; Professor Diame Zimmerman, New York University School of Law, and Professor Dennis Karjala, Arizona State University College of Law, for amicus Copyright Law Professors. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
Trevino, a retaliatory arrest case that—so far—illustrates just how easy it is for officials to escape liability for throwing someone in jail for criticizing them. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm
In Arizona, a court of appeals vacated a trial court’s temporary order granting a parent and her former partner equal visitation with the parent’s child, holding that the trial court had “failed to employ adequate procedural and evidentiary safeguards to protect the interests of the legal parent. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
Palestinian Authority, a case that was one of a pair of human rights cases argued on February 28. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
G.A.T., JR., Appellee. 2nd District.Public employees -- Drug testing -- Discovery -- Subpoena duces tecum -- Non-profit advocacy organization moved to quash subpoenas for documents in connection with action challenging constitutionality of mandatory drug testing of state employees -- Motion to quash is denied in part with respect to documents that are publicly available on the organization's website and responsive to defendant's request -- Authentication of these documents by deposition of… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
