Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 81 - 100 of 321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am by David Urban
”  It covers other states as well, including Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, and Alaska. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:20 pm by Joe Consumer
This week, the state Supreme Court “found the township and DEP were protected from liability in the case because they are government agencies. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:56 am by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
Farrow also formed a limited-liability company that grows cannabis and supplies it to dispensaries throughout Oregon. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:48 am by Mark Temple and Allison Williams
In the underlying case, two former Ernest & Young (E&Y) employees filed a class and collective action lawsuit claiming that the accounting firm misclassified their jobs as exempt from the overtime pay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to avoid overtime liability. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
During this time, our users have been the subject of nearly 50 court cases brought by employers across 14 states. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm by Dave Abels
Often, multiple parties, including an employer and an insurance company, may bear part of the blame for a crash. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Plaintiffs’ damage expert then developed comprehensive damage exposure models according to the theories of liability and the available damages under the substantive law in each case (e.g., wage deductions, deceptive trade practices, rescission, and unjust enrichment). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Lorene Park
One employee won summary judgment as to her employer’s liability for FMLA interference after a federal court in Pennsylvania rejected the employer’s argument that FMLA leave is limited to medical emergencies. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:44 am by azatty
We can barely count how many cases dealing with controversial or cutting-edge subjects seem to come up in Arizona. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
 Conditioning liability on lack of consent, as endorsed in Section 213.2, is consistent with the trend to recognize sexual assault as an infringement on personal autonomy rather than only as unjustified force or coercion. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am by Lorene Park
In one case, a Missouri employer gave an employee 24 weeks of maternity leave in 2012. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
In Arizona, if an employee has worked in the state for 60 days in a year, the employer is required to do withholding. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Because Section 11 is a strict liability statute, the court noted, plaintiffs do not have to show scienter. [read post]