Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 141 - 160 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am by Jay Yurkiw
” The court analyzed a handful of cases addressing these issues, including the January decision in In Re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-md-2299 (W.D. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:52 pm
” Prior to this case, over the seven years since Section 304’s enactment, and the hundreds of accounting restatements filed by public companies, the statute had never before been used by the SEC against a CEO or CFO who was not personally accused of securities law violations. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:32 am by admin
The firm takes most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only gets paid for their fees and costs out of money recovered for clients. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and involves the right to challenge the conciliation proceedings of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in employment discrimination matters. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In both cases, the security vulnerabilities in HTC Android-based devices undermined consent mechanisms that would have otherwise prevented unauthorized access or transmission of sensitive information. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:32 pm by Robert B. Milligan
They also provide a wider variety of remedies than contract claims, exposing defendants to liability for all harm proximately caused by the defendants’ conduct. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Candelaria Issues: Whether an Arizona statute that imposes sanctions on employers who hire unauthorized aliens is invalid under a federal statute that expressly “preempt[s] any State or local law imposing civil or criminal sanctions (other than through licensing and similar laws) upon those who employ, or recruit or refer for a fee for employment, unauthorized aliens”; whether the Arizona statute, which requires all employers to… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Amy Bellman
Courts' Rulings on Medical Marijuana in the Workplace Only a handful of cases have resulted in decisions that provide some guidance to employers regarding their potential liability in these situations. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
  Tomorrow, the Court will consider whether Arizona law can sanction employers who hire undocumented workers in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:30 am
Now the justices will decide whether the family can go forward with its injury claim.The justices also return to the always thorny issue of church-state interaction in a case from Arizona. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 12:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   Because states all have their own wage and hour laws, employers may face liability under either or both laws. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am by Jason Shinn
Chamber Institute for Legal Reform found that in 2006-08 companies at the low end of the range were paying $620,000 per case, and those at the high end were paying almost $3 million per case in discovery costs. [read post]