Search for: "Arizona v. Central" Results 1 - 20 of 519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs announced an executive order on Friday that protects abortion rights within the state one year after the Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Thomas Jefferson: -76% (59 v. 241) Arizona Summit: -65% (17 v. 49) John Marshall (Atlanta): -50% (108 v. 216) Florida Coastal: -43.% (60 v. 106) North Carolina Central: -38% (103 v. 166) Southern Illinois: -33% (76 v. 114) Appalachian: -32% (50 v. 73) District of Columbia: -31% (64 v. 93)... [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:37 pm by Nathan Meyer
This post is based, in part, on a summary of the McClure trial in the Trial Reporter of Central & Northern Arizona, a bi-monthly publication that summarizes Arizona jury trials and awards. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
Box 6123, Site Code (791A) Phoenix, AZ 85005 Phone: (602) 542-6853 Web: http://www.de.state.az.us/ddd Central AZ Council on DD P. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
You could just say "Central District of California" or "District of Arizona," but the Ninth Circuit provides additional information as well that's not on the caption; namely, what particular division (i.e., city) the district court was in. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 5:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials so far in Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:16 pm
We hold that Scheehle's constitutional challenge to the Appointment System is properly considered under the regulatory takings test set forth in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Relying on a Supreme Court case called Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. [read post]