Search for: "Arizona v. Fisher"
Results 1 - 20
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 3:05 pm
Petitioner filed his brief in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Two others stand out: race-based affirmative action, and state constitutional experimentation in the regulation of federal elections.On affirmative action, in Fisher v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:05 am
With the Supreme Court seemingly poised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:07 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
At The National Law Review, Eric Fisher writes that the court’s recent decision in Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
Hodges to affirmative action in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:38 pm
The Holding In Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Bollinger case in 2003, where O’Connor was the fifth vote joining the liberals and Kennedy was in dissent, until his surprising decision two years ago to uphold the University of Texas’s use of race in admissions in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm
Arizona to unlock his phone. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:14 pm
Id. at *6, quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was Turner v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Yesterday, the court sent five Arizona cases challenging life-without-parole sentences of juvenile offenders back to the state courts for reconsideration in light of last term’s decision in Montgomery v. [read post]
