Search for: "Arkansas v. Oklahoma" Results 121 - 140 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Alaska 1999) (rejecting lost chance doctrine altogether).Arkansas:  Holt v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in the 2005 case Roper v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At The American Prospect, Dorothy Samuels discusses the cert petition in Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 The 9 states using the ‘49 percent’ form: Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, North Dakota, Utah and West Virginia. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
The SAG amicus brief opposing Oregon in Klein does not mention that nine of the 11 participating states — Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia — have laws that define public accommodation more broadly than federal law, to include businesses that provide goods or services to the general public. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Arkansas, 18-9517, appeared in a Law and Order script, it would be sent back for rewrite on the ground of implausibility. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Derek T. Muller
It should be noted that many schools do not presently share at-graduation employment statistics with USNWR, and probably all of them would be better off, to some degree or another.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BENEFITAt grad v. 10 monthElon 10.2%, 78.7%Dayton 30.0%, 87.1%Willamette 30.6%, 85.2%Texas A&M 46.9%, 93.8%Gonzaga 31.7%, 83.7%Regent 31.2%, 83.1%Houston 31.9%, 81.9%Arkansas 39.3%, 86.6%Northern Illinois 26.3%, 77.5%Samford 31.4%, 80.7%Arkansas-Little Rock 7.1%, 64.6%DePaul… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Derek T. Muller
It should be noted that many schools do not presently share at-graduation employment statistics with USNWR, and probably all of them would be better off, to some degree or another.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BENEFITAt grad v. 10 monthElon 10.2%, 78.7%Dayton 30.0%, 87.1%Willamette 30.6%, 85.2%Texas A&M 46.9%, 93.8%Gonzaga 31.7%, 83.7%Regent 31.2%, 83.1%Houston 31.9%, 81.9%Arkansas 39.3%, 86.6%Northern Illinois 26.3%, 77.5%Samford 31.4%, 80.7%Arkansas-Little Rock 7.1%, 64.6%DePaul… [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
For taxpayers subject to the highest rate schedule, starting in tax year 2021, Arkansas’s top marginal rate has been reduced from 6.6 to 5.9 percent, which was accomplished by eliminating the top income tax bracket. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 pm
Currently, the Purple states are Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Vermont, Wyoming (residents only), and Oklahoma (residents of Okla. or other permit-free states). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Arkansas allows comparative fault/negligence in strict liability. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm by John A. Gallagher
 In States of Nevada; State of Texas; Alabama; Arizona; Arkansas; Georgia; Indiana; Kansas; Louisiana; Nebraska; Ohio; Oklahoma; South Carolina; Utah; Wisconsin; Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm by Katherine M. Harrington
The Plaintiff States included Louisiana, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
From the intro to this week’s edition: Leading off this edition is the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision concerning the West Memphis Three in Damien Echols v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Oklahoma, 18-8801Issue: Whether the boundaries established in the Treaty of February 23, 1867, for the eight tribes within the former Indian Territory of northeastern Oklahoma constitute an “Indian reservation” today under 18 U.S.C § 1151(a). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm by Mary Dwyer
Nova Health Systems 12-1170Issue: (1) Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in declaring the Oklahoma Ultrasound Act, which requires the performance, display, and explanation of a pre-abortion ultrasound, to be facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  A broader formulation exempts anything that is government "regulated" (Alaska, Nebraska, Oklahoma). [read post]