Search for: "Armour v. State of Ohio" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2008, 5:08 am
where he Ohio's history with Trust Mills and cites a case Ohio Trust Mill Case of Cleveland Bar v Sharp Estate Services, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2008, 2:45 pm
where he Ohio's history with Trust Mills and cites a case Ohio Trust Mill Case of Cleveland Bar v Sharp Estate Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 4:13 pm
where he Ohio's history with Trust Mills and cites a case Ohio Trust Mill Case of Cleveland Bar v Sharp Estate Services, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Emma Snell
  Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]