Search for: "Armstrong v. Executive Office of President"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
The Court should be guided by a solicitous concern for the effective discharge of the President’s duties and the dignity of his high office. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 4:32 pm
Executive Office of the President that that the NSC is not an agency under the Meyer test. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Armstrong, Bowsher v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Second, the president must take care that the law is executed faithfully, in keeping with his Oath of Office to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
Will USCIS officers infer from U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
The legitimacy of the office of the presidency rests on public faith that the government is placing the interests of the country first. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 7:06 am
Accordingly, to the extent that it is directed at the Executive Office of the President, a ruling on the Discovery Motion is held in abeyance. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
This year’s NDAA also contains numerous cyber-related provisions, among them § 1752, which establishes a new Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD) within the Executive Office of the President (EOP). [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Indeed, Griffin’s Case was about a state office, and the Court in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:03 pm
Second, Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
Will USCIS officers infer from U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
For example, in Armstrong v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am
In Toshiba Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
PHOTOS: President Trump's Mount Rushmore speech"We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4th, 1776 [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm
A. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 35: Home Office wins on Supreme Court appeal – No absolute requirement for claimant to know gist of case against them in civil proceedings if national secrets involved. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
A police officer who shot teenage Tyler Cassidy is suing a lawyer over a website that said he “executed” the boy and should be charged with manslaughter. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
Wilkins goes on: In Thompson v. [read post]
