Search for: "Armstrong v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
The Court’s ruling, in State v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:49 pm
Washington Superior Court Judge Sharon S. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 6:54 pm
(Espeso); BS 175803; 7/14/21; Los Angeles Superior Court App. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
In the case of Armstrong v Lendon, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that the employer had to pay 21 months of reasonable notice plus aggravated damages for the manner of termination which caused humiliation, embarrassment and the loss of self-esteem. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
The Court also cited its own decision in M.O. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:59 am
In Gunter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
Armstrong, 248 N.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:07 pm
Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal.4th 360 and Belaire-West Landscaping, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:57 am
Armstrong, 203 N.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:21 pm
S.A.R., the Armstrong County court had issued a custody order following a hearing in January, 2010. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:25 pm
Superior Court (Sept. 10, 2007, B195317, Second District)11 p. opinionPlaintiff Shersher brought a consumer action against Microsoft. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
by Christian Stegmaiercstegmaier@collinsandlacy.comIn the case of Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:10 am
In Bonilla v Great-West Life Assurance Company et al, the Ontario Superior Court applied the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning in Bhasin v Hrynew to determine that an employer did not breach its duty of good faith by refusing to fund a $72,750 rehabilitation program requested by the insurer of an employee on long term disability. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Superior Court (2009) and Hughes vs. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Superior Court (2009) and Hughes vs. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:06 pm
Rump filed suit in Contra Costa Superior Court on May 11, 2009 alleging that he was not properly compensated while employed by Phillips. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:45 pm
Superior Court which asks whether employers are required to ensure employees take breaks under the California Labor Code. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, again, dismissed the federal claim with prejudice and remanded the matter to state court. [read post]
