Search for: "Armstrong v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Armstrong, Bowsher v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Unsatisfied by her response, Nadler concluded his questioning by rather bluntly stating that the Trump administration will need to offer a more compelling argument to reauthorize the “perhaps useless” CDR program than “maybe someday it’ll do some good. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
Due process, according to Armstrong v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
Due process, according to Armstrong v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
For example, in Armstrong v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:04 pm
About 100 deaths are due to Vibriosis each year in the United States out of an estimated 80,000 illnesses. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80-84, 92 S.Ct. 1983, 32 L.Ed.2d 556 (1972); Armstrong v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:19 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Hale, 1 Wall. 223, 233 (1864); Armstrong v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
In Pirelli Armstrong Trust v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Eric Leo Armstrong, IV v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
However, Judge Quinn-Brintnall argued that Judge Armstrong’s stated concern about the improper use of expert testimony to support the lea [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
