Search for: "Arnold I Levy"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
Arnold J thought that (i) was “well arguable”, although it would require consideration of the factual matrix, and that (ii) was a plain issue of fact and not something that could be dealt with on a strike-out. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:10 am
“I am grateful to my dear friend and partner John Levi and to the LSC board for having given me the opportunity of a lifetime,” Sandman wrote. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
Among the many things he said are these:* Citing Case C-145/05 Levi Strauss & Co v Casucci SpA [2006] ECR I-3703. he observed that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had held that the question of trade mark infringement fell to be assessed as at the operative date, this being the date from which the use of the sign began. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
The clue here is in para 189 where Arnold J warns helpfully thatFurthermore, although I cannot prejudge later arguments in this case, it is not inevitable that future applicants will recover all their costs even if successful: compare the practice in respect of Norwich Pharmacal orders, as to which see Totalise plc v Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:59 am
Arnold J explains: “I do not consider that it follows that reproduction of any part of a broadcast or first fixation amounts to an infringement. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
KEY THEMES AND IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS I. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
Research on Consumer Decision-Making Alan Levy from the FDA. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 11:14 pm
That is quite a title in the company of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Aldrich Ames and Benedict Arnold. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Will you still read me, when I'm 64? [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
But I do think that, when the complexities of the situation are understood, the course the Attorney General and I have chosen is not merely allowable but preferable. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm
I posit that the answer depends considerably on whether the proceedings are ex parte or inter partes. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:51 pm
That is quite a title in the company of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Aldrich Ames and Benedict Arnold. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
I bet it won’t be long before somebody starts a whistleblowing hedge fund. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
RBKT received a ‘voids allowance’ of 3.5% and a ‘commission’ of 9.3% of the overall water bill levied by Thames Water. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:09 am
A FEW MORE: A radio interview with Cato Chairman Bob Levy David Isenberg says “Take my Koch brothers, please! [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:47 am
"Right now I have a specific ruling that applies to four people. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 8:49 pm
What do I mean? [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
Darren tells all.* BREAKING NEWS Full decision out in the Lyrica case, and it's a whopperDarren breaks the news of the issuance of Mr Justice Arnold's first instance judgement following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert (case management decision here, Court of Appeal decision here and here, and four first instance decisions here, here, here and here).* The debate over… [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 1:34 pm
That’s why I thought I could come back this way today, ’cause I got the ticket already. [read post]
