Search for: "Arnold Winters v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
The first is long-time reader and occasional guest contributor Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd), whose warm smile and good humour are a cheery antidote to the dark, dark days of winter. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
This Kat is feeling festiveAs temperatures drop and the winter nights draw in, what better way to unwind than catching up on last week's IPKat? [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
Upcoming proceedings In Arnold v Fairfax & Shadbolt, a two-week jury trial has been set down for 26 February 2018, with Mallon J presiding. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 3:39 am
She is dressed in a Naf Naf ski jacket, popular during the cold 1985 winter. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:34 pm
Arnold Loewy & Charles Moster, It’s Debatable: Is our society in a state of decline? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Collection v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:55 am
Review of Robert Wood's article "Factor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
, Astrosociological Insights (Winter 2017). 2. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
