Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
Lord Justice Arnold commented the presentation by asking how we should strike the balance between innovation and unfair monopolies. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:09 am
She passed, managing to impress a visiting Matthew Arnold with her Greek (Terrell, 41). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
This is largely derived from the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in General Tire v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1975] 2 All ER 173 – a patent case in which it was held that "[d]amages should be liberally assessed but.. the object is to compensate the plaintiffs and not punish the defendants".The court is looking for the royalty which "would have been arrived at in negotiations between the parties, had each been making reasonable use of their respective… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:47 am
D’Aston v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:06 pm
The trade mark owner must have a legitimate reason to oppose the sales, though: this could be because the goods are being resold in cheap-looking packaging that damages the luxury cachet of the trade mark, which was the case in Brealey v Nomination de Antonio e Paolo Gensini SNC [2020] EWCA Cir 103 (3 February 2020).The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court held that the defendant had infringed the trade mark, and now the Court of Appeal (Patten, Floyd and Arnold LJJ) has agreed. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
Francisco at lectern during oral argument in Seila Law v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO Rulings The IPSO Committee released seven rulings this week: 06319-19 Docherty v Evening Times, no breach after investigation. 09224-19 Laws v Daily Star, no breach after investigation. 05601-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi family v Mail Online. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Lilly counterclaimed that the divisional patent was invalid (Lilly v Genentech [2020] EWHC 261 (Pat)). [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which… [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:33 am
In Drywall Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
In its Annual Spring Conference (chaired by Lord Justice Richard Arnold), the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law's conference will bring together practitioners, scholars and policymakers to examine the latest decisions, research and political developments in the field of intellectual property and health. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
See Gullickson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:33 am
Just like in an October 2019 early first hearing in another Nokia v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
