Search for: "Arnold v. Intervet, Inc."
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
No dictionaries were harmed (or even mentioned) in the construction of the claims, which can only be a good thing.PriorityMoving, then, to the question of priority (see [303] to [345]), the Judge referred to his own earlier opinion in Intervet UK v Merial [2010] EWHC 294 (Pat), which the parties agreed was an accurate summary of the relevant principles. [read post]
