Search for: "Arnold v. Sharpe"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2020, 12:52 am
And so, this week Arnold LJ handed down his judgment in FibroGen v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
This term has been no different, but my, how they have ended in a dramatic fashion with....drum roll please...a reference to the CJEU from Mr Justice Arnold on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896.The problem and the questions to be referred What do you do if your patent is about to expire, but despite notice that Member States have agreed to grant your marketing authorization (MA) under the… [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic (but not distinctive) London black cabMr Justice Arnold addresses the issue of whether the iconic London cab can be a trade mark in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Last week saw another Michaelmas decision from Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court in the form of Merck Sharpe and Dohme Limited v Shionogi & Co Limited [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat). [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:56 am
The IPKat has recently spotted Target Fixings Ltd v Brutt Beteiligungsgesellschaft and others, a UK trade marks decision of Appointed Person Richard Arnold QC, Case O-372-06 from 20 December 2006. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Arnold Padgett v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
From Sharpe v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
Sharp v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
Foreign Judgments: The Limits of Transnational Issue Estoppel, Reciprocity, and Transnational Comity
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm
A distinctive feature of Singapore law on issue estoppel is the rejection of the broadly worded “special circumstances” exception to issue in English common law (Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93). [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:39 am
Matthias Zigann) granted Sharp an injunction against Daimler (which triggered a settlement, see 1, 2), as did the 21st Civil Chamber in a Conversant v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
* English Patent Court speeds up, reminds Mr Justice Carr in Celltrion v BiogenCelltrion Inc. v Biogen Idec Inc., F. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP | Social dialogue at the EPO | Ms Potter's extended copyright | CJEU on TMs' genuine use |… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. [read post]
