Search for: "Arnold v. Smith "
Results 101 - 120
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith in Sports Direct International plc v Rangers International Football Club plc and another [2016] EWHC 85 (Ch) to refuse to commit the respondent for contempt for alleged breach of an injunction shows the caution that the court will sometimes show when it comes to seeking to enforce injunctive relief. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 2:22 pm
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “How is the amount of child support decided in North Carolina? [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
The role of the adviser or assessor is set out in Halliburton v Smith [2006] EWCA Civ 1599. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:04 pm
The current case is Smith v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question: “I was found not guilty of a charge, why does my record still show the charge? [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:01 am
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What can you sue for in a personal injury case? [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Rose, JD, MBA, Principal, Rachel V. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Garman Co., 843 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Ark. 1992); Arnold v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 62 [week ending on Sunday 6 September] - Copyright and industrial design in Japan | Greek political slogans and trade marks | Moral rights in legal works | Economist v patents | CJEU in Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | Copyright over criminals' works | IPEC in Minder Music & Another v Sharples | Apple’s European slide-to-unlock patent declared… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
Court of Appeals decision (Storch v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:52 pm
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What can you sue for in a personal injury case? [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “When do you get alimony? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question ” I have been injured on another person’s property. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Smith (7th Cir. 1978); Tollett v. [read post]
