Search for: "Arnold v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Arnold is a member of the North Carolina State and Mecklenburg County Bars, and is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in Federal District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
On the same blog, IPKat team member Jeremy notes an extempore decision of Mr Justice Arnold on the difficult question of controlling uncapped costs in patent proceedings that are more easily afforded by one party than another, in Canon v Badger. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
The same patent was previously held invalid by the UK Courts for lack of novelty as a result an invalid priority right in Novartis v Hospira (see [2013 EWCA 516 (Pat.) and [2013] EWCA Civ 1663). [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Ohio “officially” signed on to the movement in 1993 in Arnold v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
In a decision that is only moderately Arnoldian (139 paragraphs), Mr Justice Arnold refused today to grant an interim injunction that Warner Lambert had requested against Actavis [Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015)]. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am
G & K appealed, and a panel of judges on the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals recently revisited the term “humiliation” in the context of the Auto-Owners policy. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After six marvellous months with Marie-Andrée, Rebecca and Lucas, it is now time to meet Valentina, Suleman and Tom.* The New USPTO Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter EligibilitySuleman’s debut post is about the new United States Patent and Trademark Office's Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility, which has the purpose of assisting the USPTO staff in examination and post-grant proceedings to determine whether claimed subject matter is eligible… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:51 am
” Volokh thinks DiRosa’s post—even if it advocates murder—advocates murder at some indefinite future time, making it protected speech pursuant to a pair of United States Supreme Court decisions—Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
As Wikipedia explains, “impeaching” a witness “in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual who is testifying in a trial. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch) is a 1 December ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in which some of the best legal brains in that jurisdiction had to give some cogent thought to the meaning of the common-or-garden word "consents". [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
The jury didn’t buy it, and Elonis was convicted after a trial in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Accordingly, Arnold J. held that Apotex was barred from claiming under the cross-undertaking in damages which Servier had given. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:12 pm
United Foods, and United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
customers within the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Drake v. [read post]
