Search for: "Art Capital Group, LLC v Neuhaus"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Case: Art Capital Group, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:47 am
The complaint also fails to state a cause of action for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, because plaintiffs fail to allege that the attorneys did anything more than prepare legal agreements for Cohen (Art Capital Group, LLC v Neuhaus, 70 AD3d 605 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:57 am
(See Peci/e v Titan Capital Group, LLC, 96 AD3d 543, 544 (1st Dept 2012), leave to appeal denied, 20 NY2d 856 [2013].) [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
In any event, since an attorney acting in good faith is not civilly liable for the acts of the client, the plaintiffs’ claim is defeated by their failure to allege any facts that would demonstrate that, to the extent RFL assisted the LIMGA shareholders as alleged, RFL knew or should have known that the LIMGA shareholders’ termination of the services of LIMA and Gabay and attempt to seize Gabay’s shares was wrongful (see Art Capital Group, LLC… [read post]
