Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 81 - 100
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 1:27 pm
Witness the case of Arthur Andersen (actually a partnership but the same principles apply), where the company went out of business, and thousands lost their jobs, when the government insisted on prosecuting the company as well as the responsible individuals. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
"Applying criminal penalties to white-collar crime by employees of corporations has never been very successful and can lead to disastrous results, such as in the case of Arthur Andersen LLP, which ultimately went out of business due to a criminal prosecution for destruction of evidence that cost "thousands of jobs". [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
ARTHUR ANDERSEN: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS AND GENERAL RELEASESBy Jennifer Brown Shaw and Becki D. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, 946, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 282, 189 P.3d 285 (Edwards)), we conclude that the employee has a viable Tameny claim. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
., et al. (08-22) - duty of elected judge to disqualify from case in which a major campaign donor has an interest Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 12:37 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, which addressed a non-solicitation of customers provision. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:00 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:09 am
The Court has released the opinion in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
See Arthur Andersen LLP v.United States, 544 U.S. 696, 705-08 (2005); United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:02 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP., No. 11-56592, slip op. 14 (9th Cir. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(post-conviction, due process, Sec. 1983, DNA testing, freestanding claim of innocence, discovery, substantive claim, materiality, habeas petition, exculpatory evidence) Tuesday, March 3 Arthur Andersen LLP, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 12:37 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, which addressed a non-solicitation of customers provision. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:43 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:51 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:17 am
It was part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has been described as “prompted by the exposure of Enron’s massive accounting fraud and revelations that the company’s outside auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP, had systematically destroyed potentially incriminating documents. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
But as any former partner at Arthur Andersen LLP — once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms — could attest, an outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
But as any former partner at Arthur Andersen LLP — once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms — could attest, an outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:07 pm
Arthur Andersen, LLP may provide some additional guidance. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:07 pm
Arthur Andersen, LLP may provide some additional guidance. [read post]
