Search for: "Arthur Edwards" Results 101 - 120 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
New online in Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: Taking the Discipline of Law Seriously: Twining, Arthurs, and Histories of Academic Lawyers, by Susan Bartie. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:04 am
In 2002, it was discovered that the freezer had suffered a power interruption, which either damaged or destroyed the stored sperm.UBC relied on an exclusion clause in the agreement, which stated it could not be held liable for any malfunction of the equipment, even if the cause was within the control of the university.The plaintiffs, represented by lawyer Arthur Grant, argued that a provision of the Warehouse Receipt Act applied. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
 Also in NYT is a review of Something Must Be Done About Prince Edward County: A Family, a Virginia Town, a Civil Rights Battle by Kristen Green (Harper).A third NYT review examines David K. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:42 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
George Edward Perine, Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:10 am
(Books by GMU profs in bold.)The Worldly Philosophers, by Robert HeilbronerSpin-Free Economics, by Nariman Behravesh*Capitalism and Freedom, by Milton Friedman*Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff, by Arthur OkunNudge, by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein*The Return of Depression Economics, by Paul Krugman*Animal Spirits, by George Akerlof and Robert Shiller*The Myth of the Rational Voter, by Bryan Caplan*Economic Gangsters, by Raymond Fisman and Edward Miguel*The Price of… [read post]
Arthur Andersen LLP.[3] In Edwards, a tax manager brought suit against his former employer, Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”), over an eighteen month non-compete. [read post]
Arthur Andersen LLP.[3] In Edwards, a tax manager brought suit against his former employer, Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”), over an eighteen month non-compete. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by James (Jim) A. Goodman
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008) and held that customer non-solicits were unenforceable, it noted that Edward’s agreement likewise contained an employee non-solicit, but since Edwards did not dispute that portion of the agreement or contend that it was unenforceable, it did not address the employee-non-solicit in its holding. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am by Russell Beck
  Indeed, in 2008, the Supreme Court of California issued its seminal decision of Edwards v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:48 am
  In the Journal of Moral Philosophy, there is a Symposium on Moral Particularism, with contributions by Simon Kirchin, Richard Norman, Roger Crisp, Edward Harcourt, Sean McKeever, Michael Ridge, Alan Thomas, and Jonathan Dancy. [read post]