Search for: "Arthur v. City of Los Angeles" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sunnyvale City Council (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1351 and Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 [City’s and RDA’s approval of detailed term sheet for 49ers stadium project was not project approval]; City of Santee v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The opinion resulted from the second appeal in long-running litigation challenging approvals for the controversial Newhall Ranch development project in northwest Los Angeles County. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Royal Way of Prague traverses the Staroměstské Náměstí (the Old Town Square), crosses the river at the venerable Karlův Most (Charles Bridge), and then climbs the hill on the river’s left bank to Pražský hrad (the Prague Castle, as depicted in the picture at the top of the post). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]