Search for: "Arthurs v. PITTSBURGH"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 6:50 am
UPMC, Judge Arthur Schwab of the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:26 pm
District Judge Arthur J. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:51 am
District Court Judge Arthur J. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:37 am
2010-1155 Univ. of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
Arthur D. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:50 pm
Part V is a brief conclusion. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm
v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:28 am
Arthur Hellman (Pittsburgh): Buried in the patent bill that President Obama signed into law Friday (Pub. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:30 am
In early press coverage, The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review provides a news update headlined "Court: District Judge Arthur Schwab can continue to preside over Wecht prosecution. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:34 pm
Bloomberg quotes University of Pittsburgh law professor Arthur Hellman commenting that it is unlikely any of the parties will seek to reopen the case, as the underlying controversy remains in the courts, and could be back before the Supreme Court shortly. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:22 am
May 10, 2016 Schwab, J.), Judge Arthur J. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
Attorneys Arthur J. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:05 pm
Arthur Hellman (University of Pittsburgh School of Law) has posted on SSRN a new article entitled "The Regulation of Judicial Ethics in the Federal System: A Peek Behind Closed Doors," see here. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:44 pm
"Commenting on the proportion of 9th Circuit cases, University of Pittsburgh School of Law professor Arthur Hellman noted that the circuit was 'overrepresented on the docket.'" And 6 of the 54 are from state court, so the Ninth's share of federal cases is 18/48 or 37.5%, close to double its 20% of total federal circuit cases.The story describes Harrington v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
"[O]f [*10]necessity, [they] must act solely through the instrumentality of their officers or other duly authorized agents" (Lee v Pittsburgh Coal & Min. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
"[O]f [*10]necessity, [they] must act solely through the instrumentality of their officers or other duly authorized agents" (Lee v Pittsburgh Coal & Min. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co. of Pittsburgh Pa., 105 AD2d 627, 628, 481 N.Y.S.2d 358 [1st Dept 1984]). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Horton v. [read post]
