Search for: "As v. District of Columbia Ex Rel. BR" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] The emoluments clauses litigation, part 4 — an emolument is the “profit derived from a discharge of the duties of the office”
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
See State ex rel. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Neutral Data and Strategic Transparency: The Legal Battles Over the Political and Governance Effects of a Census Question On Citizenship Status in "U.S. in New York v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce" (file 15 Jan. 2019)
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Trump v. Trump: Journalists' Urging Source to Breach Nondisclosure Contract Is Constitutionally Protected
5 May 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
But Mary Trump's book—which plaintiff concedes is incorporated into the complaint—demonstrates that Mary Trump's attorney gave her permission to take those documents (opening br. ex. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Marijuana Legalization Roadblocked - Federal Appeals Court Court says Remains Scheduled as Dangerous Drug
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
Tampa Drug Lawyer - http://www.drug2go.com/
Marijuana Legalization Roadblocked - Federal Appeals Court Court says Remains Scheduled as Dangerous Drug
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
Tampa Drug Lawyer - http://www.drug2go.com/
A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/