Search for: "Ashmore v. Employment Division" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ashmore, Sr.], of counsel), for appellant.Yankwitt LLP, White Plains, NY (Michael H. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ashmore, Sr.], of counsel), for appellant.Yankwitt LLP, White Plains, NY (Michael H. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
WA Legal Roundup - Playing Catch Up
21 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
Division II C.A.R.E. v. [read post]
The Amateur Law Professor - http://theamateurlawprofessor.com