Search for: "Aspect Software Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 2:55 am
In re LG Electronics, Inc., Serial No. 86472855 (September 13, 2015) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cindy B. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:16 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Essex issued Order No. 33 denying Respondents Barnes and Noble, Inc. and BarnesandNoble.com’s (collectively, “B&N”) motions for summary determination of invalidity and noninfringement in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:32 am
BusinessWeek notes another Congressional hearing on patent reform will occur on April 26, with testimony from Kevin Sharer, chief executive of biotech company Amgen Inc.; Anthony Peterman, patent counsel for computer manufacturer Dell Inc.; and Gary Griswold, president and chief counsel of intellectual property at 3M Co.Dell Inc. is a member of the Coalition for Patent Fairness, comprised mainly of IT companies strongly seeking patent reform (including Amazon.com, Apple,… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
Patent Nos. 6,023,683 (the “’683 patent”) and 6,505,172 (the “’172 patent”), sued Lawson Software, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:56 pm
Skyline Software Systems Inc. sued Keyhole in 2004, saying Keyhole's technology (on 3D mapping)infringed on a patent it obtained in 2002. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:47 am by Kelley Chittenden and Jason Gordon
Pact, Inc. settled charges with the FTC on September 21, 2017 that the mobile software application company engaged in deceptive acts and practices, unfair billing practices, and failure to disclose material terms relating to its Pact app. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:47 am by Kelley Chittenden and Jason Gordon
Pact, Inc. settled charges with the FTC on September 21, 2017 that the mobile software application company engaged in deceptive acts and practices, unfair billing practices, and failure to disclose material terms relating to its Pact app. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
A further layer was added in the decision in CA Inc v ISI Pty Limited, where the substantiality of any copying of computer software would be assessed looking at the "...taking into account the importance of function" of the software and its code. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 6:55 am
There, the plaintiff alleged that certain aspects of billing software which the defendants had misappropriated qualified as trade secrets. [read post]