Search for: "Associated Merchandise Group, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am by Ray Dowd
He also regularly counsels clients on the protection, enforcement and licensing of their intellectual property assets.Selected Experience• Successfully represented the plaintiff in Yurman Design Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:32 pm
” Davis’ heirs seek injunctive relief and the destruction of all of the "confusingly similar" Miles Café advertising and merchandise. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 5:06 am by Robin Shea
LHC Group, Inc., the court ruled that driving was clearly an essential function of the rank-and-file position but not necessarily the team leader position. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(IPKat) US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D New York: Merchandising of Shepard Fairey ‘Obama Hope’ image not fair use; factual issues remain on substantial similarity: Shepard Fairey et al v Associated Press (Copyrights & Campaigns) Do-over on the writing requirement: Vergara Hermosilla v. [read post]
Patton is an associate in Venable’s Advertising and Marketing Practice Group, representing clients in a broad range of industries on matters related to advertising, marketing, and intellectual property law. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., 11-616, involving a First Amendment challenge to St. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Retailing & Consumer Servs. 86 (2014) ("An examination of product type did produce substantial difference as impulse buying was greater for fashion merchandise than supermarket purchases and general merchandise. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,784,584 owned by  and Technology Properties Ltd. and Patriot Scientific Corporation, entitled HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROPROCESSOR USING INSTRUCTIONS THAT OPERATE WITHIN INSTRUCTION GROUPS. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am by Peter J. Sluka
Services, Inc. v Jupiter Partners, L.P., 309 AD2d 288, 300 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
§ 1338 (2000), against Defendant, Sound Merchandising, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am by assoulineberlowe
Local international dispute resolution firm GST LLP (“GST”) represented Plaintiff WF Worldwide Group Mexico Financiamiento y Colocación de Equipo (“WF Worldwide”) and obtained the 2.3 million dollar default judgment that was ultimately vacated. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:10 am by Kristian Soltes
But scores of small community institutions are also listed, along with large and small processors with roots in the banking industry, including Fiserv Inc., FIS Inc., and Jack Henry & Associates. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]