Search for: "Associates Discount Corp. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
The Marketability Discount Unlike in many other states, DLOM is recognized in New York’s fair-value jurisprudence as an appropriate consideration in valuing ownership interests in closely held business entities, that accounts for the greater time and risk associated with the sale of corporate shares for which there is no public market. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:14 am
I worked on the Freeman case when I was at the CFPB General Counsel's office -- here's the Brief for the United States -- and I attended the oral arguments. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm
Atacs Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The CAFC, in Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
A policyholder must be provided an actuarially reasonable premium credit or discount for this coverage. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
See, e.g., Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm
Stetson v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Accession, Inc (Patently-O) CAFC: Jurisdiction in patent declaratory judgment actions: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
