Search for: "Associates Discount Corporation v. Held"
Results 41 - 60
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 8:06 pm
Samsung v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:10 am
Steele v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
The Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act, S. 148, meant to overturn the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
In what I believe will be called “Starbucks VI,” which constitutes the third appellate decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am
Nebraska Supreme Court Overturns Application of Discounts In Fair-Value Buyout Bohac v Benes Service Co., 310 Neb. 722 [Neb. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
United States Dredging Corp., a judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, where the court attempted to clarify the distinction between a 'marketability discount,' a discount applied in stock valuation to compensate for the lack of a ready market for the shares, and a 'minority discount,' a discount applied in stock valuation to compensate for the lack of control enjoyed by a minority shareholder. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:52 am
See Elkins v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
In a ransomware scenario, the crime is more akin to a shakedown where the corporate victim’s data is held hostage until the company pays the ransom. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
Part V concludes with many unanswered questions to this current and controversial decision. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
The exemption applies to any “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
A valuation hearing shall be held on a date to be scheduled by the court. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Willacy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
In the post Millien discusses that Individual inventors and corporate IP owners are used to dealing with Accountants, Lawyers and Investment Advisors – all professionals who are governed by federal and/or state professional regulations, as well as national association guidelines. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
” He stresses that the ruling is limited to closely held corporations, which are typically “mom-and-pop operations” that could face substantial liabilities if they were unable to use the corporate form. [read post]
31 May 2007, 10:38 am
Hill v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
In any event, the court--per an opinion by Douglas Ginsburg--held that: We ... hold the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously for having failed once again — as it did most recently in American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
