Search for: "At & T COMMUNICATIONS v. Marks"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
******************************************Do you remember Cases T-604/11 and T-292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM, Diset? [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:14 am
Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-140/08); [2009] WLR (D) 308 “In proceedings concerning the alleged invalidity of a community trade mark, departments of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) are not bound by earlier final decisions in opposition [...] [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:19 am
196/11 P, Formula One Licensing BV v OHIM, Global Sports Media Ltd, on an opposition relating to a Community trade mark that was filed a little over eight years ago and which may still have a few more years' mileage to it. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
The designThe case concerned is Chen v OHMI - AM Denmark (Dispositif de nettoyage), T-55/12 of 25 April 2013 and can be retrieved here. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
Back in 1994 (or perhaps more accurately 1989, when the original directive was made) that was a radical new departure in trade mark law, not just in the European Community and still less just in the UK, but in the world at large: the US had dabbled with such protection but even in the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders case the judge had stuck to the well-trodden path of confusion rather than following the "dilution" signpost.A major problem is the notion of a trade… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
Mark William Ivey v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
Now he has an answer: next month, as a pleasant hors d'oeuvres to the European judicial Christmas break, the Court of Justice of the European Communities will be hearing arguments in Case C-569/08 Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
There are three fresh appeals against decisions of the OHIM Boards of Appeal concerning Community trade mark applications on the Curia website today. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
Back in 1994 (or perhaps more accurately 1989, when the original directive was made) that was a radical new departure in trade mark law, not just in the European Community and still less just in the UK, but in the world at large: the US had dabbled with such protection but even in the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders case the judge had stuck to the well-trodden path of confusion rather than following the "dilution" signpost.A major problem is the notion of a trade… [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:19 am
Mark D. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S is another of those intellectual property cases that hits the headlines on account of its subject matter rather than because of its intrinsic legal interest -- though it is by no means lacking in legal interest. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
In our case, the plaintiffs’ mark, as stated in the registration, is “[t] he color(s) light blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In yesterday's judgments in Cases T-59/14 ‘INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD’ and T-609/13 ‘SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY’ the General Court of the European Union reviewed the EU case-law on slogan marks, rejecting the appeal of the US-based corporation Blackrock Inc., on the basis that its Community trade mark (CTM) applications were devoid of distinctive character according to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
These questions arose in connection with this Kat’s perusal of the recent decision of the EU General Court (Seventh Chamber) given on October 2, 2013, in The Cartoon Network, Inc. v OHIM and another (Case T-285/12),here, which inter alia addressed the issue of coexistence.As a matter of practice, and depending upon the jurisdiction, the thinking behind an inquiry into coexistence is that, if the two marks coexist in various jurisdictions, it should be an indication… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
A cautionary example of such a situation is the recent General Court judgment in Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO - MHCS (Nuance de la couleur orange) (T-652/22) concerning the orange colour trade mark for the Veuve Clicquot champagne. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
This Kat was on his travels and otherwise engaged earlier this month when the General Court of the European Union gave its ruling in Joined Cases T‑292/14 and T‑293/14, Republic of Cyprus v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, so sadly it slipped his attention. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
In August 2008, Great Blue Sky International (GBS), with the encouragement of Promodyne, filed for a Community trade mark (CTM) for MABA. [read post]
