Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 241 - 260
of 891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 7:53 pm
On Jan. 12, Western District Judge Ricardo Martinez refused to dismiss such claims plaintiff brought in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
To determine strength, courts place the mark on the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness most prominently discussed in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
In the Ninth Circuit, it is known as the “Sleekcraft” factors, after the influential trademark infringement case of AMF Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am
[Ed. note: The Arizona FPD represented the codefendant in this case.]Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
UPDATE EVEN: Mike Atkins has more. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
In that sense, the rule from Miller was different from other categorical (and thus substantive) punishment bans, like capital punishment for intellectually disabled defendants, Atkins v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
In that sense, the rule from Miller was different from other categorical (and thus substantive) punishment bans, like capital punishment for intellectually disabled defendants, Atkins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Douglas-Banks v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court case Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
Here is the abstract: In Atkins v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:40 am
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
The respondents pointed out that in AAA v Associated Newspapers and Weller v Associated Newspapers; children have been awarded damages despite being oblivious to their privacy rights being violated. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Hill v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 5:01 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
Texas 15-65Issue: Whether Texas’s standard for determining if a capital defendant meets the second prong of the definition of intellectual disability (“deficits in adaptive functioning”) violates the Eighth Amendment in light of Atkins v. [read post]
